Wednesday 4 December 2013

New Trick of Content Creation

Now People are too much serious about content Creation.
Here I Post a video, There is a question about Content creation use of other article sources & create a new one.
See Video and also read Comments & discussion regarding video. I also post here these comments too.

Click Here For View a video




Top Comments



Don't "Stitch" for SEO: Is it ok to stitch together pieces of content from across the web? [Video] via +Matt Cutts #seo

Fun fact: Pandas love eating stitched content. :)
Reply
 · 
10

Bad News For Weekly Content Roundups

I recently posted on my blog a few ways to generate content if you're lacking ideas. One of those (and a fairly popular one) is to do a weekly content round up. This is where you'll take some hot articles, post excerpts along with your own ideas and link back to the original article. This may be a bad idea. Depending on how you go about it. Watch this video by Matt Cutts for a clearer understanding.

Is it a good practice to combine small portions of content from other sites?

#contentcreation   #contentmarketing   #blogging  

 · 
2

Can you "stitch" copy from multiple websites and blogs together to make your own content? Unsurprisingly, Google's Matt Cutt suggests that you tread very carefully when considering this technique. 
Reply
 · 

Stitching: the practice of taking pieces of content from multiple sources to create your own source.

In this video, Matt Cutts answers a question about stitching.  In general he says it is a "high risk area" and encourages people to avoid this in general.

In my opinion it is somewhat ok to do some "stitching" as long as it is being used to cite a source within your own unique and original article body.


Do not stitch aggregate content into a convergence article. If you want to read quotes of content then write a academic paper. I had a professor that made us read his book in college, on 1 page he cited 8 references and nothing was his own work. I told him that his book lacked any real substance as all he did was copy and paste. I got a B in that class but is that book was a website, I would have flagged him for spam. Do not copy and stitch to create an article. Ever.
Reply
 · 
4
View all 6 replies


+Thomas P. I look at Knowledge Graph as an enhanced search result. I think that is fine as Google is the largest scraper and renderer of digital content that we know of. 
Reply
 · 
2


Matt, Please tell me you're joking - and not suggesting that quantity & frequence can be a substitute for quality.
Reply
 · 
1

Great video!
Reply
 · 

"You might encourage us"? Stop beating around the bush and just say if we do it, we have no chance of ranking! That's the truth!
Reply
 · 
1

Mutt Cutts video on stitching (using pieces of content and giving credit). 
Reply
 · 

"Is it a good practice to combine small portions of content from other sites?"
#GoogleSearchQuality   #GoogleWebmasterHelp   #contentmarketing  
Reply
 · 


Dids Main via Google+

11 hours ago
No to stitching!  Make sure you add value... FYI. +Nick Crang (I know you love this stuff!) +John Burnham +Carol Cronin 
Reply
 · 


Currently unavailable....
Reply
 · 

Is it for a company news & press release ?
Reply
 · 

Google’s Matt Cutts: Stitching Content Makes For Bad Quality Content
Reply
 · 

Yet Google itself does this all the time! But then it is called 'search results'...
1

Or on other words, stop copying Creative Commons content, throwing ads on it and expecting to do well :)

Indians are very clever....... but anyway nice questions +Rajesh Bihani 
Reply
 · 

Splicing articles is bad......
2

Hi Matt, Can a site still do well in Google if I copy only a small portion of content from different websites and create my own article by combining all, considering I will mention the source of that content (by giving their urls in the article)?
Rajesh, New Delhi, India
Reply
 · 

Basically if you plagarize, do it smartly. Change active voice to passive voice and vice versa. :-) If you stitch, stitch smartly and let the the web full of more copies of content.
Reply
 · 

Glad my question was picked up by Matt. In adwords also they don't allow this and call them as bridge pages.
Reply
 · 


Dear Rajesh from New Delhi (the capital of fake article creation presumably called "SEO").

Indeed, and you should be ashamed of a garbage page like this. http://www.softwebworks.com/seoportfolio.html
class="seolink"? Really?

Can you people in this black-hat businesses stop spamming the web with such idiotic crap, for once and for all.

Article creation and all that dumb trash you seem to be involved in, is pointless. When can you parasite morons lock this in your brain?
Reply
 · 

Rajesh? The big bang theory... lol :)

Google Webmaster Help - News Roundups

Beware if you have been curating content and re-posting it as your own. Even if you add some of your own ideas the whole practice could be a bad idea.

#googlewebmasterhelp   #contentmarketingtips  
Charles Heitz originally shared this
Bad News For Weekly Content Roundups

I recently posted on my blog a few ways to generate content if you're lacking ideas. One of those (and a fairly popular one) is to do a weekly content round up. This is where you'll take some hot articles, post excerpts along with your own ideas and link back to the original article. This may be a bad idea. Depending on how you go about it. Watch this video by Matt Cutts for a clearer understanding.

Is it a good practice to combine small portions of content from other sites?

#contentcreation   #contentmarketing   #blogging  
Reply
 · 

En gros, Matt Cutts déconseille de faire un site dont le contenu n'est qu'une accumulation d'extraits d'articles trouvés ailleurs, même en mentionnant la source (agrégateurs).
N'est-ce pas Panda qui démasque ce genre de sites ?
Reply
 · 
1


En fait qu'est ce que M Cutts conseille ou autorise ? Est ce quelqu un le sait vraiment ?

Reply
 · 
1


Il faut demander à Matt Cutts ,ce qu'est Google Actualités. Il y a énormèment d'applications Google qui font ce genre de chose: voler ce qui appartient aux autres. Mais apparement pour Google c'est OK. Je ne pense pas que Google puisse nous donner des leçons de morale à ce sujet.
Reply
 · 
1

La Content Curation è spam: parola di Google
La content curation intesa solo come selezione e riporto di piccole porzioni di contenuti presi da diversi fonti, anche con citazione dell'origine e  senza un apporto originale e di valore ai contenuti può essere un fattore ad alto rischio per la presenza nei risultati di ricerca di Google.

Ecco la voce ufficiale di Google che conferma quanto dicevo 2 anni fa a ottobre sui rischi di una content curation senza un'integrazione ai contenuti.
Reply
 · 
8
View all 5 replies


Credo sia fondamentale la presentazione e la categorizzazione dei contenuti, questo', per me differenzia spam da valore.
Reply
 · 
2


Esatto +Riccardo Mares

Content Curation NON è copiare ed incollare parti di contenuti.

Content Curation è dare ulteriore valore a quei contenuti, filtrandoli, curandoli editorialmente, e soprattutto esprimendo un punto di vista originale.

In questo campo il vero maestro è +Robin Good che nel 2011 scriveva:

http://www.masternewmedia.org/content-curation-come-distinguere-i-veri-curatori/
 · 
Reply
 · 
3

Pożyczone i kradzione ma nie rankować wysoko. Terefere...
Reply
 · 
2

Wrzucasz na swoją stronę tylko treści z innych serwisów, tak, że artykuły składają się tylko z obcych treści? Lepiej zmienić podejście - już Yahoo uznawało to kiedyś za spam...
Reply
 · 
2

Matt Cutts über Inhalte, die aus kurzen Snippets unterschiedlicher Webseiten bestehen. Er sagt, wenn man das automatisch macht, ist es ein hochriskanter Bereich. Was war doch gleich das Kerngeschäft von Google? Snippets von 3rd Party Content automatisch zusammenklatschen vielleicht? :)
Reply
 · 
1


Amy Grech via Google+

10 hours ago
Glenn Gabe originally shared this
Don't "Stitch" for SEO: Is it ok to stitch together pieces of content from across the web? [Video] via +Matt Cutts #seo

Fun fact: Pandas love eating stitched content. :)
Reply
 · 

Charles Heitz originally shared this
Bad News For Weekly Content Roundups

I recently posted on my blog a few ways to generate content if you're lacking ideas. One of those (and a fairly popular one) is to do a weekly content round up. This is where you'll take some hot articles, post excerpts along with your own ideas and link back to the original article. This may be a bad idea. Depending on how you go about it. Watch this video by Matt Cutts for a clearer understanding.

Is it a good practice to combine small portions of content from other sites?

#contentcreation   #contentmarketing   #blogging  
Reply
 · 
1


Willy Os via Google+

10 hours ago
Nuevo vídeo de Matt Cutts

2


AJBassett via Google+

12 hours ago
Reply
 · 

Reply
 · 

When going through the disavow process, I found gobs of sites like this linking to us... and wasn't sure if I should disavow them or not. Any thoughts?
Reply
 · 
1

Content curation, o semplice copia? Il limite si fa più sottile e Google sempre più attento e perspicace. Non si tratta più solo di contenuto duplicato ma anche delle citazioni e di come si fanno. La qualità, intesa come valore per gli utenti, al primo posto.
Reply
 · 

2

Someone copied my article from my blog and post it to his blog and include the URL of my blog post as a source. I'm worried about my site that it can affect on the next algorithm. 
Reply
 · 

Hah. Matt answered this query from a dude based in Delhi. 
Reply
 · 
2
View all 3 replies


Avoid it for Google. Yahoo completely hates it.
Reply
 · 
1


Dude's business model is in shambles. 
Reply
 · 
2

Reply
 · 

Hello, clients? Yeah, this. Please stop asking me to do this. It's bad for your SEO, m'kay? Thanks.
Glenn Gabe originally shared this
Don't "Stitch" for SEO: Is it ok to stitch together pieces of content from across the web? [Video] via +Matt Cutts #seo

Fun fact: Pandas love eating stitched content. :)
Reply
 · 
1


OK.  I won't ask you to stitch.

But I do have some socks that need darned.  Would you mind taking care of those darned socks?  KTHXBAI.
Reply
 · 

Valerio Notarfrancesco originally shared this
La Content Curation è spam: parola di Google
La content curation intesa solo come selezione e riporto di piccole porzioni di contenuti presi da diversi fonti, anche con citazione dell'origine e  senza un apporto originale e di valore ai contenuti può essere un fattore ad alto rischio per la presenza nei risultati di ricerca di Google.

Ecco la voce ufficiale di Google che conferma quanto dicevo 2 anni fa a ottobre sui rischi di una content curation senza un'integrazione ai contenuti.

-----------------------END------------------------- 

Magento Development Company Ahmedabad |Digital Marketing | Plumtree Web Solutions

No comments:

Post a Comment